PLEXINA Inc.

Solutions/Veridok™

Veridok™ · by Evidentia

Research that holds up to scrutiny.

AI-powered evidence synthesis with full transparency. Every claim cited. Every source verified. Every decision traceable.

Request a walkthrough How a run works
Abstract kestrel hovering above topographic contour lines, a dotted sightline scanning the terrain below
Scope Decompose Search Screen Extract Synthesize Report

7-stage evidence pipeline, fully automated and fully auditable

What it is

A research product, not a chat answer

Veridok is built for researchers, analysts, and decision-makers who need defensible intelligence. You ask a research question in plain language, choose a lane, and a systematic pipeline searches, screens, extracts, and synthesizes. The output is a cited evidence report, not an unsourced paragraph.

Tools

Research and verification, in one place

Each tool is a prove vehicle for a pipeline we already run: evidence search, screening and fact extraction, report synthesis, and claim verification. “Live” means a self-serve flow exists. “Runnable on a walkthrough” / “Proving this piece” means the pipeline completes today with an operator; there is no public self-serve launcher yet. The composed systematic-review product UI is a later destination. It is not listed as available.

Live

Research question

Ask a research question and get a synthesized, cited evidence report across your chosen lane.

In progress

Bibliography Verifier

Paste a reference list and check existence, retraction, and currency signals for each citation.

The applet UI is complete, but its verification methodology is still rolling out.

Live

Verify Receipt

Look up and independently re-verify a provenance receipt by execution id.

Viewer only

Claim Check

Extract claims from a document, verify each against its cited sources, and grade certainty.

The verification report viewer is real. Self-serve document submission is not available. No launcher yet.

Proving this piece

Verify Article

Fact-check a published article's claims against primary sources and flag unsupported statements.

The claim-verification pipeline completes on an operator-run. No self-serve article launcher yet. Walkthrough by request.

Runnable on a walkthrough

Result-Set Screener

Screen a batch of search results or candidate sources against inclusion/exclusion criteria.

Proving this piece of the evidence-search pipeline. Operator-run today; no self-serve intake yet.

Runnable on a walkthrough

Fact-Table Extractor

Pull structured fact tables out of long-form documents for downstream comparison or synthesis.

Proving this piece of the fact-extraction pipeline. Operator-run today; no self-serve intake yet.

How it works

Three steps to defensible intelligence

On a guided walkthrough, an operator runs an existing project pipeline. This is not a self-serve systematic-review product, and not a slide deck.

1

Ask your research question

Plain language. No query syntax. The pipeline decomposes your question into structured search strategies.

2

AI executes a systematic pipeline

Seven stages: scope, decompose, search, screen, extract, synthesize, report. Multi-agent consensus at every decision point.

3

Get a defensible intelligence report

Structured deliverables: comparison matrices, gap analyses, evidence syntheses. Every claim traced to its source.

Status

What is ready, and what is next

What's ready

  • Research question and Verify Receipt are live self-serve applets.
  • Bibliography Verifier is mid-rollout.
  • Claim Check completes its verification pipeline. The page is viewer-only. There is no submit launcher.

What's next

  • Result-Set Screener and Fact-Table Extractor run as a guided walkthrough of existing screening and extraction work. This is prove-this-piece, not a 6–12 month greenfield.
  • Verify Article is proving the claim-verification piece on the same engine.
  • The composed systematic-review UI that will consume these pieces is not available.
  • There is no public self-serve storefront on this page.

How we talk about quality

People, evidence, and AI are all fallible. That is why the system exists.

Governance and process (quality monitoring and self-improvement) surface those failures and mitigate them. That is the point.

We do not publish accuracy percentages. We do not claim infallibility or guaranteed-correct output.

The same discipline applies across multidisciplinary research lanes. Clinical is one of them.

Collaborations

Collaborations and design-partner work exist at mixed maturity. This page does not publish a named roster or endorsements.

Bring a question that has to survive review.

A walkthrough is a live run on your question, not a slide deck. Email hello@plexinasolutions.com.

Request a walkthrough